internet.com
You are in the: Small Business Computing Channelarrow
Small Business Technology
» ECommerce-Guide | Small Business Computing | Webopedia | WinPlanet

www.ecommerce-guide.com/solutions/secure_pay/article.php/345671

Back to Article

VISA and Mastercard Crack Down on Web Merchants
By Alexis Gutzman
April 21, 2000

Have you ever had a charge you didn''t authorize appear on your credit card statement? If you have, then you probably called the credit card company to get the charge removed. In all likelihood, you found that you had to sign some form the credit card company sent you, they investigated and reversed the charge, and that was the last you heard of it. It was something of an inconvenience (after the initial outrage passed), but since it was resolved to your satisfaction, you probably didn''t give it another thought.

Congratulations. You successfully executed a chargeback against a merchant! Of course, you were in the right, your card was used fraudulently, and that''s the exact reason why we have consumer protection laws.

As a merchant, the shoe is on the other foot. You''re a merchant that provides products and/or services via your Web site and you''ve been told by the merchant bank that issued you your precious merchant account - your permission to accept credit card payments online - that Visa and Mastercard are tightening up their rules about chargebacks. From now on, companies that deliver immediate fulfillment online - which includes real-time software downloads, real-time downloads of books and articles, real-time access to restricted content sites, such as pornography, sports information, and financial news, and subscription sites such as dating services - will be subjected to much tighter rules about how many chargebacks their merchant accounts can process before they start incurring fines from Visa and Mastercard. Merchants can even lose their merchant accounts, altogether.

Chargebacks are usually measured as a percentage of volume. So, for example, if $100,000 goes through your merchant account in one month, and $1,000 gets charged back against your account, you''ve got a 1% chargeback rate. The magic number is now 1%, which is pretty low in the world of the Web, where fraud is often a problem.

Reasons for High Chargeback Rates
Sites in the "high risk" categories listed above are likely to have relatively high chargeback rates for three reasons:

  1. It''s easier to commit fraud when there''s no product physically delivered, and the criminal is able to get his goods in real time. It''s much more difficult for merchants to do thorough fraud checks in real time. In a typical procedure, merchants to just send the card number to the credit card network (using their standard processing systems) and receive back an authorization code which means that the number is valid and the card isn''t on any stolen card list at this time. Merchants that deliver atoms rather than bits have the brief period between when an order is placed and when it is shipped (sometimes as long as several days) to check up on any suspicious orders. For example, suspicious orders typically include multiple large dollar orders of easily resold consumer electronics -- goods that are shipped to the same non-residential address using different credit card numbers.
  2. It''s not uncommon to see chargebacks that are not due to fraudulent use of a credit card. Consumers often have short memories and tend to forget about products they purchased online that were fulfilled immediately. Or, the consumer changed his mind and initiated the chargeback as a way of informing the merchant that he no longer wanted the product/service/subscription.
  3. Merchants sometimes bill under a different name than they use on the Web. If the Web site name doesn''t match what appears on the credit card statement, it''s easy for consumers to believe they have been the victims of fraud, and initiate a chargeback.

Why Do Consumers Have All the Power?
The obvious question to ask at this point - if you''re not a merchant, of if you''re a merchant, and you never bothered to read your lengthy merchant agreement - is why it matters that customers instigate chargebacks so often? Shouldn''t merchants just be able to prove that the goods were delivered, even if customers forget about it, or don''t recognize the merchant''s name? In theory, yes. However, that 60 days or so timeframe that elapses between the customer initiating a chargeback and actually seeing the credit on his bill (referred to as the investigation by the merchant bank) is usually little more than the length of time it takes the merchant bank to notify the merchant that it''s out the full amount that''s being contested.

The reason that the investigation (unless the card is physically swiped at a register and is not later reported as stolen) is usually just pro forma is that consumer protection laws give consumers all the power. In most other countries, consumers have to go to much greater lengths to prove that they were the victims of fraud, and the merchants have a fighting chance to contest a chargeback.

Big Bad Corporate America
I''ve read a lot of outrage in the past week and a half from merchants and columnists about how the new chargeback policies of Visa and Mastercard are evidence of corporate greed and evil corporate America. Although a Dudley Do-right view of the world (this week, the role of Dick Dastardly is being played by Visa and Mastercard) has its own appeal, I think that merchants who are affected by this should be doing more than crying in their beer about this situation. I agree it is deplorable. Deplorable, but perhaps remediable.

What Can Merchants Do?
Merchants should want to resolve the problem with the attitude "how do I continue to accept credit card payments online?" rather than "how can I take revenge against Visa/Mastercard/my merchant bank?" If you look at the relevant laws governing liability of consumers for purchases made (http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/15/1643.html), you''ll see that Visa and Mastercard have no choice about their "customer is always right" chargeback policies. They have a brand to protect and fraud against their card holders tarnishes that brand. They have competing goals of:

  • Having as many consumers as possible using their cards
  • Having as many merchants as possible accepting their cards
  • Having as many transactions as possible going through their network
  • Maintaining an attractive brand (by keeping chargebacks - thus disgruntled consumers - to a minimum)

Rather than taking aim at the credit card networks that are bound by the laws, merchants should be taking action to see the laws modified so that all power does not lie with the consumers. I''m not talking about repealing consumer protection laws, but perhaps reviewing the laws with an eye to an appeal process for the merchant might be a good start.

The proper place to direct merchant ire is at the four Congressional Committees that govern consumer protection and banking:

Perhaps "ire" is too strong a word. I spoke with the spokesman for the House Committee on Commerce''s Subcommittee on Telecommunications, Trade and Consumer Protection, Eric Wohlschlegel, who told me that the issue of Web merchants losing merchant accounts was "on the radar" of the subcommittee, but it was not yet a real issue. He indicated that the jurisdiction for this issue would be shared between his committee and the banking committee. I also spoke with the spokesman for the Chairman of the House Committee on Commerce''s Subcommittee on Telecommunications, Trade and Consumer Protection, Rep. W.J. "Billy" Tauzin (R-LA). He said that while there''s no time for action this year, it "could be an issue next year if it''s a problem for small businesses online, but we''ll wait until there''s a hue and cry."

Put Up or Shut Up
If you''ve read many of my columns, you know how much I hate whiners. If this affects your business, rather than forwarding useless chain mail, do the adult thing and contact your representative by phone or fax (all reports are that e-mail is weighted much less heavily than phone or fax in Congressional offices - it''s just too easy to send).

The answer lies in the current laws on the books. Congress is not unsympathetic to your problems, and is waiting for you to tell them where it hurts (I warned Mr. Wohlschlegel that you would). This column gives you everything you need to do something about a situation that could potentially shut down the Web to many, if not all netrepreneurs. I''ve given you the laws; I''ve even given you the Web sites of the committees so that you can find the phone numbers and fax numbers of the Representatives and Senators who have the power to swing the pendulum in your favor. What are you waiting for?

(Tune in next week for a column on Alternative Payment Methods - I did mention that the Congressional route would be slow.)

Alexis D. Gutzman is an E-commerce Technology Author and Consultant and author of The HTML 4 Bible and ColdFusion 4 for Dummies. She holds a Master of Public Affairs degree from the Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs of the University of Texas, and she always knew that education would come in handy some day. She can be reached at agutzman@internet.com

  Go to page: 1  2  3  Next  



internet.commediabistro.comJusttechjobs.comGraphics.com

Search:

WebMediaBrands Corporate Info

Legal Notices, Licensing, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
Advertise | Newsletters | Shopping | E-mail Offers | Freelance Jobs